macintosh.world | Log In | Register

Today | News | Books | Recipes
Notes | QuickTake | Wiki | Browse
Maps | Reference | Reddit | YouTube
Chat | Games | About

Search Books

Adventure | Science Fiction | Ghost stories | Poetry | Children | History

Book

Open Original Text

,
and is much against your trans-oceanic migration--for considering how
near the Azores are to America, and in the influence of the Gulf-stream
and prevalent winds, it certainly appears marvellous. Not only are the
Azores in a current that sweeps the coast of U. States, but they are in
the S.W. winds, and in the eye of the S.W. hurricanes!

I suppose you will answer that the European forms are prepotent, but
this is riding prepotency to death.

R.T. Lowe has written me a capital letter on the Madeiran, Canarian, and
Cape Verde floras.

I misled you if I gave you to understand that Wollaston's Catalogue said
anything about rare plants. I am worked and worried to death with this
lecture: and curse myself as a soft headed and hearted imbecile to have
accepted it.

LETTER 368. J.D. HOOKER TO CHARLES DARWIN. Kew, Monday [August 6th,
1866].

Again thanks for your letter. You need not fear my not doing justice to
your objections to the continental hypothesis!

Referring to page 344 again (368/1. "Origin of Species," Edition III.,
pages 343-4: "In some cases, however, as by the breaking of an isthmus
and the consequent irruption of a multitude of new inhabitants, or
by the final subsidence of an island, the extinction may have been
comparatively rapid."), it never occurred to me that you alluded to
extinction of marine life: an isthmus is a piece of land, and you go on
in the same sentence about "an island," which quite threw me out, for
the destruction of an isthmus makes an island!

I surely did not say Azores nearer to Britain and Newfoundland "than to
Madeira," but "than Madeira is to said places."

With regard to the Madeiran coleoptera I rely very little on local
distribution of insects--they are so local themselves. A butterfly is
a great rarity in Kew, even a white, though we are surrounded by market
gardens. All insects are most rare with us, even the kinds that abound
on the opposite side of Thames.

So with shells, we have literally none--not a Helix even, though they
abound in the lanes 200 yards off the Gardens. Of the 89 Dezertas
insects [only?] 11 are peculiar. Of the 162 Porto Santan 113 are
Madeiran and 51 Dezertan.

Never mind bothering Murray about the new edition of the "Origin" for
me. You will tell me anything bearing on my subject.

LETTER 369. J.D. HOOKER TO CHARLES DARWIN. Kew, August 7th, 1866.

Dear old Darwin,

You must not let me worry you. I am an obstinate pig, but you must not
be miserable at my looking at the same thing in a different light from
you. I must get to the bottom of this question, and that is all I can
do. Some cleverer fellow one day will knock the bottom out of it, and
see his way to explain what to a botanist without a theory to support
must be very great difficulties. True enough, all may be explained, as
you reason it will be--I quite grant this; but meanwhile all is not so
explained, and I cannot accept a hypothesis that leaves so many facts
unaccounted for. You say the temperate parts of N. America [are] nearly
two and a half times as distant from the Azores as Europe is. According
to a rough calculation on Col. James' chart I make E. Azores to Portugal
850, West do. to Newfoundland 1500, but I am writing to a friend at
Admiralty to have the distance calculated (which looks like cracking
nuts with Nasmyth's hammer!)

Are European birds blown to America? Are the Azorean erratics an
established fact? I want them very badly, though they are not of much
consequence, as a slight sinking would hide all evidence of that sort.

I do want to sum up impartially, leaving the verdict to jury. I cannot
do this without putting all difficulties most clearly. How do you know
how you would fare with me if you were a continentalist! Then too we
must recollect that I have to meet a host who are all on the continental
side--in fact, pretty nearly all the thinkers, Forbes, Hartung, Heer,
Unger, Wollaston, Lowe (Wallace, I suppose), and now Andrew Murray. I do
not regard all these, and snap my fingers at all but you; in my inmost
soul I conscientiously say I incline to your theory, but I cannot accept
it as an established truth or unexceptionable hypothesis.

The "Wire bird" being a Grallator is a curious fact favourable to
you...How I do yearn to go out again to St. Helena.

Of course I accept the ornithological evidence as tremendously strong,
though why they should get blown westerly, and not change specifically,
as insects, shells, and plants have done, is a mystery.

LETTER 370. TO J.D. HOOKER. Down, August 8th [1866].

It would be a very great pleasure to me if I could think that my letters
were of the least use to you. I must have expressed myself badly for you
to suppose that I look at islands being stocked by occasional transport
as a well-established hypothesis. We both give up creation, and
therefore have to account for the inhabitants of islands either by
continental extensions or by occasional transport. Now, all that
I maintain is that of these two alternatives, one of which must be
admitted, notwithstanding very many difficulties, occasional transport
is by far the most probable. I go thus far further--that I maintain,
knowing what we do, that it would be inexplicable if unstocked islands
were not stocked to a certain extent at least by these occasional means.
European birds are occasionally driven to America, but far more rarely
than in the reverse direction: they arrive via Greenland (Baird); yet a
European lark has been caught in Bermuda.

By the way, you might like to hear that European birds regularly migrate
via the northern islands to Greenland.

About the erratics in the Azores see "Origin," page 393. (370/1.
"Origin," Edition VI., page 328. The importance of erratic blocks on the
Azores is in showing the probability of ice-borne seeds having stocked
the islands, and thus accounting for the number of European species
and their unexpectedly northern character. Darwin's delight in the
verification of his theory is described in a letter to Sir Joseph of
April 26th, 1858, in the "Life and Letters," II., page 112.) Hartung
could hardly be mistaken about granite blocks on a volcanic island.

I do not think it a mystery that birds have not been modified in
Madeira. (370/2. "Origin," Edition VI., page 328. Madeira has only one
endemic bird. Darwin accounts for the fact from the island having been
stocked with birds which had struggled together and become mutually
co-adapted on the neighbouring continents. "Hence, when settled in their
new homes, each kind will have been kept by the others in its proper
place and habits, and will consequently have been but little liable to
modification." Crossing with frequently arriving immigrants will also
tend to keep down modification.) Pray look at page 422 of "Origin"
[Edition III.]. You would not think it a mystery if you had seen the
long lists which I have (somewhere) of the birds annually blown, even in
flocks, to Madeira. The crossed stock would be the more vigorous.

Remember if you do n

Previous Next